Comment by negamax
21 hours ago
You (the org) brought fire to the masses. How that fire is used (to build or burn the cities) is not for you do decide
Stand by and share your ethics concern. But this isn't misalignment. A lot of AI use cases will be constraint/reigned in through governance evolution at every scale
Comparing it to fire isn’t really an apt comparison.
You developed the nuclear bomb. Would you give free access to every human on the planet to do with it as they see fit? Or would you demand responsible guardrails from the start?
AI companies want it both ways. This will both redefine humanity as we know it, but also nobody should try to enforce any guardrails. Why? Because it might hurt profits.
Either it’s snake oil and not as revolutionary as claimed, or people should be facing prison time for trying to claim “I just invented it and gave everyone access, I can’t be held responsible for what happens next”.
Nuclear wasn't governed until the destruction was seen. There's no reason to believe AI wouldn't follow a similar path
The bomb was literally developed under a top secret program, and they didn’t hand out functioning bombs to the general public at any point in time before “the destruction was seen”.
2 replies →
I mean, does enabling ICE to be more effective actually represent a harm? ICE has authority to do the things it’s doing. The courts are the appropriate venue to check that authority. Two agents murdering citizens is a criminal matter completely unrelated to Google’s relationship with DHS.
It feels like AI empowering scams and facilitating post-truth is more harm.
Yes. Much in the same way arming a mass shooter with an M1 Abrams is more destructive than an airsoft gun.
Also, ICE is still bound by both the 4th and 5th amendments, of which they have routinely violated. Peretti in particular was executed by an ice agent, and his murderer still runs free.
> feels like AI empowering scams and facilitating post-truth is more harm.
"There are things worse than automating the murder of innocents" is certainly and interesting take.