Comment by billyp-rva

8 hours ago

> Substack gives you a way to push content to your subscribers without an intermediary deciding what they get to read.

How do we know they won't start limiting your reach in the future? That's the path basically every other platform has gone down.

The entire pitch of Substack is "You can export the email addresses of your current subscribers at any time"

So if they stop doing the "email my subscribers whenever I post" step, another service will fill the gap pretty quick.

  • Substack notes is non exportable; the newsletter now no longer have a link to read it on your site on substack and instead link to the substack app, and subscriptions started in the app pay Substack through Apple and Google and you can't export them.

    Substack has become a roach motel but they pretend otherwise

    • Thanks for this.

      I can hear Substack marketing saying that “We don’t have any intention to put you into a vendor-lock.”

      I had a lot of discussions with companies about their marketing.

      Why do you upload your events’ photos to FB instead of your site?

      Why do you have news on LI feed and don’t make it a post on your site as well?

      Do you think they can hear it? :)

      Substack is going to become a similar service as FB, LI are… no possibility to export your data easily or not at all.

      1 reply →

    • Every single thing substack does reeks of growth hacking. I suspect that it will only get worse. For that reason alone I chose to avoid it for my newsletter.

> How do we know they won't start limiting your reach in the future?

You can never know anything about what anybody will do in the future? You can't. Why do hackers always use this argument against everything?

  • Its the terminating argument for FOSS hackers. When there is no good argument left, they fall onto that.

    "You're only going to get 20 years of use out of this proprietary service before you'll need to spend a few hours switching off! You must switch now!"

  • Hackers always use this argument against everything because you can in fact know some things about what one person, yourself, will do in the future.

    Thus they argue that you should not trust your things to other people but do it yourself, because, barring major illness, you can reasonably assume that you will try to do what is best for yourself in the future.

    • >because you can in fact know some things about what one person, yourself, will do in the future.

      Nope. At best you merely know what your current self intends to do in the future. Whether you'll do them then, or whether you'll even still want to do them then, or be able to do them then, or have regretted ever wanting to do them, and many other such things, we don't know.

      2 replies →

  • > You can never know anything about what anybody will do in the future?

    You absolutely can know something about what someone will do in the future. You gain those insights by looking at their past and present behavior and the behavior of others in similar circumstances. Hackers tend to be pretty good at pattern recognition and can often see where things are heading. Enshittification is a pretty smart bet.

    • You can do whatever research you like, but when you attempt to apply it to predicting the future, you're still speculating. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

    • So your ex girlfriend cheated on you and now you reject all contact with women because you know that "sooner or later" she's going to cheat on you? In my ears it sounds the same when hackers say you can never buy anything or use any service, because "sooner or later" it will go to crap.

      It's probably easy being a cynic, because you can always wait for decades (as another commenter argued) until you are right. In the meanwhile you have missed out on life - for no personal benefit at all.

  • Allow me to translate: “It a near certainty that they will fuck you over eventually; the question is will it be next year, next decade, or will you win the lottery?”

There's enough demand for the feature that if they stop supporting it, they won't be able to compete against anyone offering the feature.