Comment by heaney-555 5 hours ago Where are all the "this was just a marketing stunt" people now? 4 comments heaney-555 Reply reducesuffering 4 hours ago They won't admit they're wrong for a long time, because denial in the face of an abhorrently scary future is very instinctual. There are people still fighting against evidence of climate change which is less severe... uselessTA 1 hour ago >There are people still fighting against evidence of climate change which is less severe...Remains to be seen how severe, and unlike climate change there's a lot more uncertainty. Though it's conceivably more extremely catastrophic redsocksfan45 4 hours ago [dead] LearnYouALisp 1 hour ago Ah yes, dismissal by exaggeration (aka reductio ad ridiculum), and subtle inclusion of the rest by a kind of part-whole
reducesuffering 4 hours ago They won't admit they're wrong for a long time, because denial in the face of an abhorrently scary future is very instinctual. There are people still fighting against evidence of climate change which is less severe... uselessTA 1 hour ago >There are people still fighting against evidence of climate change which is less severe...Remains to be seen how severe, and unlike climate change there's a lot more uncertainty. Though it's conceivably more extremely catastrophic redsocksfan45 4 hours ago [dead]
uselessTA 1 hour ago >There are people still fighting against evidence of climate change which is less severe...Remains to be seen how severe, and unlike climate change there's a lot more uncertainty. Though it's conceivably more extremely catastrophic
LearnYouALisp 1 hour ago Ah yes, dismissal by exaggeration (aka reductio ad ridiculum), and subtle inclusion of the rest by a kind of part-whole
They won't admit they're wrong for a long time, because denial in the face of an abhorrently scary future is very instinctual. There are people still fighting against evidence of climate change which is less severe...
>There are people still fighting against evidence of climate change which is less severe...
Remains to be seen how severe, and unlike climate change there's a lot more uncertainty. Though it's conceivably more extremely catastrophic
[dead]
Ah yes, dismissal by exaggeration (aka reductio ad ridiculum), and subtle inclusion of the rest by a kind of part-whole