Comment by sim04ful 15 hours ago Why didn't they increment the version as atleast a patch update 8 comments sim04ful Reply bel8 5 hours ago So whoever is using DeepSeek V4 flash gets a massive upgrade without having to change any config. sim04ful 2 hours ago That's an absolutely terrible idea for any non-trivial project consuming it. behindsight 41 minutes ago Wasn't it stated as being in "preview" prior to this?If implementing non-trivial tasks on a preview model surely there is some anticipation of it not being the final stable release?Unless you mean they should have appended a "preview" suffix on the endpoint for extra good measure? rubslopes 12 hours ago I was also so annoyed by this. It makes communication all around difficult. Why don't they simply call it 4.1 flash? crvdgc 10 hours ago My guess would be the version number tracks the architecture change, not the weight change. kzrdude 14 hours ago Yes, and even if they seem to have updated endpoints in place they should assign the service a version number. markasoftware 15 hours ago They want to be the next Google it seems
bel8 5 hours ago So whoever is using DeepSeek V4 flash gets a massive upgrade without having to change any config. sim04ful 2 hours ago That's an absolutely terrible idea for any non-trivial project consuming it. behindsight 41 minutes ago Wasn't it stated as being in "preview" prior to this?If implementing non-trivial tasks on a preview model surely there is some anticipation of it not being the final stable release?Unless you mean they should have appended a "preview" suffix on the endpoint for extra good measure?
sim04ful 2 hours ago That's an absolutely terrible idea for any non-trivial project consuming it. behindsight 41 minutes ago Wasn't it stated as being in "preview" prior to this?If implementing non-trivial tasks on a preview model surely there is some anticipation of it not being the final stable release?Unless you mean they should have appended a "preview" suffix on the endpoint for extra good measure?
behindsight 41 minutes ago Wasn't it stated as being in "preview" prior to this?If implementing non-trivial tasks on a preview model surely there is some anticipation of it not being the final stable release?Unless you mean they should have appended a "preview" suffix on the endpoint for extra good measure?
rubslopes 12 hours ago I was also so annoyed by this. It makes communication all around difficult. Why don't they simply call it 4.1 flash?
crvdgc 10 hours ago My guess would be the version number tracks the architecture change, not the weight change.
kzrdude 14 hours ago Yes, and even if they seem to have updated endpoints in place they should assign the service a version number.
So whoever is using DeepSeek V4 flash gets a massive upgrade without having to change any config.
That's an absolutely terrible idea for any non-trivial project consuming it.
Wasn't it stated as being in "preview" prior to this?
If implementing non-trivial tasks on a preview model surely there is some anticipation of it not being the final stable release?
Unless you mean they should have appended a "preview" suffix on the endpoint for extra good measure?
I was also so annoyed by this. It makes communication all around difficult. Why don't they simply call it 4.1 flash?
My guess would be the version number tracks the architecture change, not the weight change.
Yes, and even if they seem to have updated endpoints in place they should assign the service a version number.
They want to be the next Google it seems