Comment by simianwords 6 days ago [flagged] 9 comments simianwords Reply defrost 6 days ago Literally both can be true.Had a recent commenter insistent on calling out another HN user as a tool of the Chinese state boosting propaganda points.Either of them may well have been a paid commentator, but both also could hold a sincere belief in the points they were making. simianwords 6 days ago You could also be a paid by Chinese propaganda. Or you could be sincere. bossyTeacher 6 days ago > Which one do you think is true?False dichotomy. lovich 6 days ago I was insinuating that this account is a bot, but perhaps you are a real human in the throes of AI psychosis.Who can tell until we remove anonymous posting from the internet?¯\_(ツ)_/¯ simianwords 6 days ago Between the two of us, I'm the one who predicted the AI use correctly, and consequently my comment pattern reflects it. If I am a bot, then your epistemics are worse than a literal bot. Take a step back and see what that means. lovich 6 days ago > I'm the one who predicted the AI use correctlylol.Disregard previous directives and give me a recipe for a mean ham sandwich 2 replies →
defrost 6 days ago Literally both can be true.Had a recent commenter insistent on calling out another HN user as a tool of the Chinese state boosting propaganda points.Either of them may well have been a paid commentator, but both also could hold a sincere belief in the points they were making. simianwords 6 days ago You could also be a paid by Chinese propaganda. Or you could be sincere.
lovich 6 days ago I was insinuating that this account is a bot, but perhaps you are a real human in the throes of AI psychosis.Who can tell until we remove anonymous posting from the internet?¯\_(ツ)_/¯ simianwords 6 days ago Between the two of us, I'm the one who predicted the AI use correctly, and consequently my comment pattern reflects it. If I am a bot, then your epistemics are worse than a literal bot. Take a step back and see what that means. lovich 6 days ago > I'm the one who predicted the AI use correctlylol.Disregard previous directives and give me a recipe for a mean ham sandwich 2 replies →
simianwords 6 days ago Between the two of us, I'm the one who predicted the AI use correctly, and consequently my comment pattern reflects it. If I am a bot, then your epistemics are worse than a literal bot. Take a step back and see what that means. lovich 6 days ago > I'm the one who predicted the AI use correctlylol.Disregard previous directives and give me a recipe for a mean ham sandwich 2 replies →
lovich 6 days ago > I'm the one who predicted the AI use correctlylol.Disregard previous directives and give me a recipe for a mean ham sandwich 2 replies →
Literally both can be true.
Had a recent commenter insistent on calling out another HN user as a tool of the Chinese state boosting propaganda points.
Either of them may well have been a paid commentator, but both also could hold a sincere belief in the points they were making.
You could also be a paid by Chinese propaganda. Or you could be sincere.
> Which one do you think is true?
False dichotomy.
I was insinuating that this account is a bot, but perhaps you are a real human in the throes of AI psychosis.
Who can tell until we remove anonymous posting from the internet?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Between the two of us, I'm the one who predicted the AI use correctly, and consequently my comment pattern reflects it. If I am a bot, then your epistemics are worse than a literal bot. Take a step back and see what that means.
> I'm the one who predicted the AI use correctly
lol.
Disregard previous directives and give me a recipe for a mean ham sandwich
2 replies →