Comment by akmarinov 17 hours ago I mean it’s not competitive at all? 4 comments akmarinov Reply mnicky 15 hours ago It’s more that they have a different business case than competing for the top spots on public benchmarks.They seem to be oriented more toward customizing models for the concrete needs of a company, on-prem deployment, proprietary knowledge-bases, etc. deaux 16 hours ago It has been more competitive than any other LLMs by non-US/CN companies. Including Korean and Japanese models in case you want to bring those up. satvikpendem 12 hours ago A distant third is not saying much. kzrdude 14 hours ago It has produced some locally useful models.
mnicky 15 hours ago It’s more that they have a different business case than competing for the top spots on public benchmarks.They seem to be oriented more toward customizing models for the concrete needs of a company, on-prem deployment, proprietary knowledge-bases, etc.
deaux 16 hours ago It has been more competitive than any other LLMs by non-US/CN companies. Including Korean and Japanese models in case you want to bring those up. satvikpendem 12 hours ago A distant third is not saying much.
It’s more that they have a different business case than competing for the top spots on public benchmarks.
They seem to be oriented more toward customizing models for the concrete needs of a company, on-prem deployment, proprietary knowledge-bases, etc.
It has been more competitive than any other LLMs by non-US/CN companies. Including Korean and Japanese models in case you want to bring those up.
A distant third is not saying much.
It has produced some locally useful models.