Comment by johnnyanmac

2 hours ago

Yet they do it indirectly all the time to bust unions. That's not really a barrier.

We agree, then, that it's ineffective at its stated goal of constraining an employer's power.

  • Indeed. But that's by design from decades of efforts to reduce union powers. A proper system would simply patch the obvious loopholes to get the intended result. But sometimes neglect is a better tool than opposition.

    • So why should I bind myself to it, if it's reached this point? The master's tools won't dismantle the master's house. Subjecting myself to a collective bargaining agreement meaningfully limits my individual power, but no longer meaningfully limits my employer's power.

      2 replies →