Comment by supermatt 2 days ago But clearly not the microbloggers on twitter/x, Bluesky, etc, who use the patterns I mentioned. 2 comments supermatt Reply Retr0id 2 days ago Those are definitionally not microbloggers. It's ok for a platform explicitly for microblogging to not cater to their macroblogging desires. supermatt 2 days ago Definitionally not?"Microblogs, for example on Twitter..." https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/microblo..."Some popular social networks such as X (formerly Twitter), Threads, Tumblr, Mastodon, and Bluesky can be viewed as collections of microblogs." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microblogging
Retr0id 2 days ago Those are definitionally not microbloggers. It's ok for a platform explicitly for microblogging to not cater to their macroblogging desires. supermatt 2 days ago Definitionally not?"Microblogs, for example on Twitter..." https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/microblo..."Some popular social networks such as X (formerly Twitter), Threads, Tumblr, Mastodon, and Bluesky can be viewed as collections of microblogs." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microblogging
supermatt 2 days ago Definitionally not?"Microblogs, for example on Twitter..." https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/microblo..."Some popular social networks such as X (formerly Twitter), Threads, Tumblr, Mastodon, and Bluesky can be viewed as collections of microblogs." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microblogging
Those are definitionally not microbloggers. It's ok for a platform explicitly for microblogging to not cater to their macroblogging desires.
Definitionally not?
"Microblogs, for example on Twitter..." https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/microblo...
"Some popular social networks such as X (formerly Twitter), Threads, Tumblr, Mastodon, and Bluesky can be viewed as collections of microblogs." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microblogging