Comment by ozgrakkurt

Organization is too abstract here.

It also depends on how you model the problem. You can easily say the hardest part is hiring people if you are the boss. Since the people you hire can do everything else that needs to be done.

Managing and motivating people is the hardest part for the person who is doing it.

If you are hiring you might say it is harder to find good managers than programmers.

It is not measurable who did a good job at what as almost everything requires a group of people doing different things.

You can see how pointless this is becoming as we don’t have a measure for anything.

This kind of problem requires assumptions because it doesn’t hing on anything natural.

For example, if you start by believing salary indicates value then you can go from there.

In the end there are millions of managers, millions of programmers, millions of ux designers etc. It is kind of funny to suggest doing any of these is inherently harder than the other.

Just imagine you are judging a project. You have everything about it recorded. How hard do you think it would be to judge who had more part in the outcome in what way? If 10 people judged it separately, how many would have similar opinions etc.

It is impossible to judge even for a specific case, so it is a joke to consider to find the universal rule for it.

In the end it is ok to believe something but it is also important to not forget that it is a belief