Comment by ethin

> Okay. Please write such a system yourself.

Why? This has already done via existing processes. My point was to illustrate that if the future is LLMs then surely these processes wouldn't be needed anymore? After all, the LLM would just... Do it itself.

> ... the safety-critical systems are made safe by following a strict process, not by skills of individuals, which makes it orthogonal to involvement of LLMs.

And an LLM that is going to take all the jobs wouldn't be able to execute that process independently and with little oversight?

If my example is, to you, not a good one, what would you rather I use? Most of the common ones can be overly trivialized/minimized (particularly by someone who is uninterested in admitting that LLMs can't do something). That is not to imply that the gp is this kind of individual, but far too many people who I ask to do this (or something similar) are exactly that kind of person: believing that LLMs are insanely great and can't admit (or see) the cons.