Thank you for pointing out this issue. The homepage did indeed use too many common landing page elements before actually showcasing the product. I redesigned the homepage, removing status labels, promotional slogans, and unnecessary entry points, making the interactive context graph the main focus of the page.
Analogy: Textual version of Material Design from Google.
Standardization in important information rich environment is good. Standardization for art is not good. We should not mix these two distinct scenarios. Or maybe I am old.
> Analogy: Textual version of Material Design from Google.
What? The post I linked to is talking about the layout and appearance of the page, in addition to a few textual elements.
> Standardization in important information rich environment is good.
Why is this good in general? And specifically, how is standardizing on e.g. a meaningless status indicator (that doesn't really indicate the status of anything) "good"?
Besides, this is not standardization, it's statistical models (LLMs) converging on a design for arbitrary and likely inscrutable reasons, without understanding the meaning or purpose behind design.
Had the exact same thought. It’s like reading a foreign language – and I’m going to be honest – not load bearing at all.
Thank you for pointing out this issue. The homepage did indeed use too many common landing page elements before actually showcasing the product. I redesigned the homepage, removing status labels, promotional slogans, and unnecessary entry points, making the interactive context graph the main focus of the page.
Please don’t write your posts using LLMs.
Analogy: Textual version of Material Design from Google.
Standardization in important information rich environment is good. Standardization for art is not good. We should not mix these two distinct scenarios. Or maybe I am old.
> Analogy: Textual version of Material Design from Google.
What? The post I linked to is talking about the layout and appearance of the page, in addition to a few textual elements.
> Standardization in important information rich environment is good.
Why is this good in general? And specifically, how is standardizing on e.g. a meaningless status indicator (that doesn't really indicate the status of anything) "good"?
Besides, this is not standardization, it's statistical models (LLMs) converging on a design for arbitrary and likely inscrutable reasons, without understanding the meaning or purpose behind design.