Comment by EA-3167 1 day ago What research works that way? 4 comments EA-3167 Reply rowanG077 1 day ago large parts of Computer science, mathematics, theoretical physics, economics, some humanities research and I'm probably missing a ton. EA-3167 1 day ago So applied math, math, applied math, applied math, and maybe some others.That makes sense, although I'd argue that at least in the realm of HEP theoretical physics has extraordinarily expensive kit compared to what scientists make. See: The LHC. rowanG077 1 day ago Reducing all these fields to mathematics is incredibly reductive. I don't think it's in good faith. 1 reply →
rowanG077 1 day ago large parts of Computer science, mathematics, theoretical physics, economics, some humanities research and I'm probably missing a ton. EA-3167 1 day ago So applied math, math, applied math, applied math, and maybe some others.That makes sense, although I'd argue that at least in the realm of HEP theoretical physics has extraordinarily expensive kit compared to what scientists make. See: The LHC. rowanG077 1 day ago Reducing all these fields to mathematics is incredibly reductive. I don't think it's in good faith. 1 reply →
EA-3167 1 day ago So applied math, math, applied math, applied math, and maybe some others.That makes sense, although I'd argue that at least in the realm of HEP theoretical physics has extraordinarily expensive kit compared to what scientists make. See: The LHC. rowanG077 1 day ago Reducing all these fields to mathematics is incredibly reductive. I don't think it's in good faith. 1 reply →
rowanG077 1 day ago Reducing all these fields to mathematics is incredibly reductive. I don't think it's in good faith. 1 reply →
large parts of Computer science, mathematics, theoretical physics, economics, some humanities research and I'm probably missing a ton.
So applied math, math, applied math, applied math, and maybe some others.
That makes sense, although I'd argue that at least in the realm of HEP theoretical physics has extraordinarily expensive kit compared to what scientists make. See: The LHC.
Reducing all these fields to mathematics is incredibly reductive. I don't think it's in good faith.
1 reply →