Comment by tomjen3

1 day ago

Would have been doable if we could have switched to nuclear, but no.

It would've helped a ton but it's not like electricity generation is the only source of emissions. You can't run a car or a plane on nuclear power. You can technically run a cargo ship on nuclear power but that's also not gonna happen. Yet transport is the second largest source of emissions.

Batteries have only recently-ish gotten energy dense and cheap enough for electric cars to be competitive, completely different solutions are needed for long distance shipping by sea or air.

It's the same situation across many other sectors like agriculture, construction and waste management. Lots of things causing emissions that's not electricity generation.

  • It would indeed have helped a ton. It's important to not let perfection be the enemy of good.

    If we just wait around forever for a perfect solution to appear, then we'll simply be waiting around forever. That's not the path of progress.

    • I agree. I just wanted to point out that to "stop burning fossil fuels" requires more than green electricity generation. Green electricity generation is 100% necessary, just not in itself sufficient, as was implied by "Would have been doable if we could have switched to nuclear".

      1 reply →

  • As Romanians will tell you in August 2026, you can't run nuclear power stations without a cooling mechanism. In this case, it's Danube which is failing to offer that. Fusion is almost nowhere to be seen.