Comment by notpushkin

21 hours ago

> depending on what you’re developing it may or may not be a good fit for you

I think if your project is free / open source (edit: and you don’t use LLMs/AI), Codeberg is the a good starting point at least. You can move on to a self-hosted instance if you feel you’ve outgrown it, but even for larger projects I think you can get away with self-hosting just the CI runners.

And don’t forget to donate! https://donate.codeberg.org/ / https://join.codeberg.org/

if you use ai to program at all you can't use codeberg.

  • You've made the same exaggerated claim in two comments. Not only are you not banned from Codeberg if you have used LLMs to help you write code "in any of your projects", but you're not even prohibited from using LLMs to help you develop projects that you host on Codeberg.

    What you can't do is "share projects that mostly consist of code written by 'generative AI'-tools". <https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/commit/71149c7fc95ccfeae36...>

    • I feel like you just directly contradicted yourself so there must be some nuance I am missing. Or is the key word "mostly"? Like I can use LLMs to help the work but still have to type most of the code myself?

      I have not written more than maybe 10 lines of code in the last year so it seems I am prohibited from hosting on codeberg?

      Or is the key word "share" and that's somehow different from "host"?

      3 replies →

    • See also the codeberg blog post (https://blog.codeberg.org/protecting-our-floss-commons-from-...) which has more informal guidelines. That includes projects that are:

      1. created by LLM agents -- any vibe-coded projects;

      2. mainly written and maintained by LLMs -- this would cover the recent changes to the rsync project;

      3. tied to the LLM ecosystem -- this covers pytorch, llama.cpp, cursor, SillyTavern, AI skills repositories, and a whole host of other projects.