Comment by keeganpoppen
19 hours ago
i'd say this is something that has gotten orders of magnitude better with recent releases than it used to be, fwiw
19 hours ago
i'd say this is something that has gotten orders of magnitude better with recent releases than it used to be, fwiw
When asked to produce a thing, the output has a much better baseline of quality. But when you ask it to evaluate the quality of a thing, how do you evaluate the quality of its response, which is necessarily subjective and not quantifiable? How can a thing which has no experience of friction be said to subjectively evaluate quality?
Either you are yourself already a better judge of the thing’s quality, in which case the response can be of no use to you, or you are a poor judge of the thing’s quality, in which case you will be blind to the flaws in the synthesized opinion handed back to you.