Comment by spelk

16 hours ago

Admittedly a controversial take, but I think some of the AI skepticism I see is driven by status anxiety, alongside the perfectly legitimate complaints about verbosity, low-effort output, lack of a human voice, etc.

The bar for what counts as expertise is shifting. If someone with relatively little background can use an LLM to get to a reasonably informed answer much faster than before, then experience and credentials alone carry a bit less signalling power than they used to. That obviously doesn't mean the inexperienced person suddenly has the judgement, context or intuition of an actual expert, but I do think some of the hostility toward AI comes from discomfort with that change.

AI is still wrong, goes in weird circular loops, and doesn't solve the fundamental human problems around judgement, organization, learning curves, accountability, etc. But it does seem to be raising the baseline expectation for what a competent knowledge worker should produce, and I feel that shift is genuinely uncomfortable for a lot of people who based their identities around being rigorous abstract problem solvers.

Ironically, some of the AI 'trustism'[1] is very much driven by anxiety the fear of being left behind if one does not jump on the train.

I agree that it shifts the notion of what is expertise, but for the worst. It's very hard to tell who is actually an expert, and who is mimicking the expert.

The consequences vary from annoyance to downright catastrophe. e.g.: a confidently wrong medical advice

On the other side, sometimes the expertise is not a requirement for the user: "If it works and does what it says on the box, that's all I care".

I like the fact that you use the word "some", awesome to see some nuance. It's a tricky situation.

---

[1] I am being an idiot on purpose, I think the word skepticism was completely derailed from its origin and meaning.

A minimum amount of skepticism is very healthy, especially for software engineering. Most software engineers, and science-based professions for that matter, are skeptics at heart. And it's a good thing.

Skepticism is the base of science; science thrived when we admitted ignorance and became skeptic towards our own knowledge.