Comment by my002 2 days ago That's assuming that human-level AI is a possibility with current approaches. 3 comments my002 Reply skeledrew 1 day ago No need even for "human-level" per se. It just has to be useful enough that it upends the current economic order, which it's already well on the way into doing. traverseda 2 days ago No, it's assuming there's a non-trivial chance that they will. thatwasunusual 2 days ago I'd assume we want at least human-level intelligence, but better than human-level _decision making_. ;)
skeledrew 1 day ago No need even for "human-level" per se. It just has to be useful enough that it upends the current economic order, which it's already well on the way into doing.
thatwasunusual 2 days ago I'd assume we want at least human-level intelligence, but better than human-level _decision making_. ;)
No need even for "human-level" per se. It just has to be useful enough that it upends the current economic order, which it's already well on the way into doing.
No, it's assuming there's a non-trivial chance that they will.
I'd assume we want at least human-level intelligence, but better than human-level _decision making_. ;)