Comment by shooly

2 days ago

> We don't really know where the capability ceiling of the current approach is

We do know, that the ceiling is below AGI. And it's not a matter of opinion - LLMs can not achieve AGI due to their design. Anyone telling you otherwise is lying to you.

And it doesn't matter how many or how severe bugs they can find, because it's not about what they produce, but how they produce it.

> We do know, that the ceiling is below AGI. And it's not a matter of opinion - LLMs can not achieve AGI due to their design.

[citation definitely needed]

> And it doesn't matter how many or how severe bugs they can find, because it's not about what they produce, but how they produce it.

AGI is defined by the practical outcomes, not by the way the outcomes are achieved. You have no way to know that scaled-up Transformers predicting the next token will never result in human-level intelligence, since we currently have no idea where the ceiling of that approach is.

  • > [citation definitely needed]

    If you're not even familiar with how LLMs work, perhaps you should restrain yourself from confidently talking about this topic until you educate yourself. You're only spreading misinformation.

    > AGI is defined by the practical outcomes, not by the way the outcomes are achieved

    That for sure would be a very convenient definition, especially for all those AI labs trying to convince investors that they achieved AGI. Unfortunately everyone knows, that knowing the right answer isn't the same as knowing where that answer came from.

    • > If you're not even familiar with how LLMs work, perhaps you should restrain yourself from confidently talking about this topic until you educate yourself. You're only spreading misinformation.

      I am very familiar with how LLMs work, and I am telling you that there is no consensus that they cannot achieve AGI in the machine learning community. Some people think so (such as Yann LeCun), others disagree. We just don't know yet.

      > That for sure would be a very convenient definition, especially for all those AI labs trying to convince investors that they achieved AGI. Unfortunately everyone knows, that knowing the right answer isn't the same as knowing where that answer came from.

      AGI is defined by capabilities, not methods.