Comment by sophrosyne42

Election denialiam can and should mean more than just the current thing. If you want to use a proprietary definition, then so can I.

It is not less dangerous because you include Marxist delusions like "capital" in your description, as if "capital" is an autonomous entity with a will and interests of its own. In fact, it takes money to run a campaign, and that money comes from a large variety of interests and sources, all of which are competing and not by any means unitary, anf among which include very not "capital"-like things such as workers unions, individual donations, groups set up by citizens, etc.

You don't get a pass because you think your election denialism sounds sophisticated and progressive by inserting Marxist terms into the picture.