Comment by avarun 15 hours ago Why did they skip version 3? 6 comments avarun Reply MichaelNolan 14 hours ago As a joke. Back when 2 came out, they promised there would never be a version 3. I.e., no breaking changes. Then they realized they did need to make a breaking change, so the only way to be true to their promise was to skip version 3. asdf88990 1 hour ago This can be a good summary of htmx overall; a confident solution based on half understanding of the problem domain. SoKamil 10 hours ago Exponential versioning. Next major would be 8. _doctor_love 14 hours ago Carson promised they'd never do a version 3...but he never said they couldn't do a version 4. gwking 14 hours ago I'm so pumped for v8! recursivedoubts 14 hours ago this guy gets it
MichaelNolan 14 hours ago As a joke. Back when 2 came out, they promised there would never be a version 3. I.e., no breaking changes. Then they realized they did need to make a breaking change, so the only way to be true to their promise was to skip version 3. asdf88990 1 hour ago This can be a good summary of htmx overall; a confident solution based on half understanding of the problem domain.
asdf88990 1 hour ago This can be a good summary of htmx overall; a confident solution based on half understanding of the problem domain.
_doctor_love 14 hours ago Carson promised they'd never do a version 3...but he never said they couldn't do a version 4. gwking 14 hours ago I'm so pumped for v8! recursivedoubts 14 hours ago this guy gets it
As a joke. Back when 2 came out, they promised there would never be a version 3. I.e., no breaking changes. Then they realized they did need to make a breaking change, so the only way to be true to their promise was to skip version 3.
This can be a good summary of htmx overall; a confident solution based on half understanding of the problem domain.
Exponential versioning. Next major would be 8.
Carson promised they'd never do a version 3...but he never said they couldn't do a version 4.
I'm so pumped for v8!
this guy gets it