Comment by archagon 1 month ago And what if the LLM ingested and “understood” it as part of its training? 2 comments archagon Reply SR2Z 1 month ago Well, I guess that's a personal question but the law is pretty clear that only a human being can "understand" anything. archagon 1 month ago How convenient.Incidentally, this suggests that once an LLM is capable of accessing and distilling a competitor's LLM without human intervention, then any legal argument about TOS violation is moot. But somehow I doubt that will fly in court.
SR2Z 1 month ago Well, I guess that's a personal question but the law is pretty clear that only a human being can "understand" anything. archagon 1 month ago How convenient.Incidentally, this suggests that once an LLM is capable of accessing and distilling a competitor's LLM without human intervention, then any legal argument about TOS violation is moot. But somehow I doubt that will fly in court.
archagon 1 month ago How convenient.Incidentally, this suggests that once an LLM is capable of accessing and distilling a competitor's LLM without human intervention, then any legal argument about TOS violation is moot. But somehow I doubt that will fly in court.
Well, I guess that's a personal question but the law is pretty clear that only a human being can "understand" anything.
How convenient.
Incidentally, this suggests that once an LLM is capable of accessing and distilling a competitor's LLM without human intervention, then any legal argument about TOS violation is moot. But somehow I doubt that will fly in court.