Comment by conartist6

3 hours ago

What I wonder is: why has nobody noticed that code editors lack a concept of 0?

When you're writing code, you can express any concept except that of an unfilled hole. We've rearranged every part of the coding process in a twisted-up way, all for the lack of a way to express lack.

If you want to be more clear about what I mean, look to tools which can express holes like https://scratch.mit.edu and https://hazel.org. They give the feeling of letting things snap together like lego bricks. Indeed, lego bricks themselves function because of the negative space (the holes) in them!

9 comments

conartist6

Reply
mungoman2  1 hour ago

This could be interesting but too vague for me to understand what you mean. Could it be explained more clearly, or link some blog entry?

  • conartist6  38 minutes ago

    Yeah, I will. I'm being a bit coy because I already have a very specific solution in mind which would be a lot like Scratch, but unifying those ideas with syntax. It should be fully ready to share quite soon.

dosisking  1 hour ago

Like Madlibs?

  • conartist6isme  22 minutes ago

    Ugh I got rate limited so I had to make a new acct just to post this reply:

    Sure! Like mad libs if you couldn't be sure if _____ was a missing part or the text what was meant to be there. In a mad lib it's obvious, but with code it may be less obvious. You certainly can't just use _ with code. Even the nil code point is allowed in some programming languages' source code (e.g. rust).