Comment by kgwgk
5 days ago
> The distinction is meaningless IMO.
Not when discussing whether it's an LLM. The second L in LLM does have a meaning.
5 days ago
> The distinction is meaningless IMO.
Not when discussing whether it's an LLM. The second L in LLM does have a meaning.
I'd argue that meaningful sequences of symbols constitute a language. This example doesn't use a human language but it does use a language IMO (at least AFAIU).
Are number sequences a language?
Are rectangles squares? I can express a passage written in english as a sequence of numbers (ie tokens).
[flagged]
You're the first! Congratulations.