Comment by xvilka

4 hours ago

Would be nice if they donate to LibreOffice then, to improve the support of various MS Office features in files, as well as comparison/diffing features. Win-win to everyone.

As much as I would hope they would... I don't think that's in character for sam altman.

They don't have to. If LibreOffice wanted them to have to, they should have used a different license.

  • Good thing that "would be nice" doesn't entail that they have to.

    • What does donation does for open source? Surely it wont come close to pay talented developers who create it. For cloud cost, there are few companies already giving generous free tier for open source.

      The only thing that donation could pay for is marketing e.g. events and meetups.

  • you people are always mixing up the legal thing to do with the right thing to do

    • I agree that it would be the right thing to do. Which is why you have to make the best attempt to make it the legal thing, because people looking to make money will not care about what's right. So, it makes sense to point out the disconnect when people use and promote pro-corporate licenses and then get upset when corporates follow them to the letter and provide them nothing but demands in return.

      If you want a mutually beneficial community, you should contribute and distribute using a license that requires it.

    • Surely "the right thing to do" includes some element of the authors' explicitly stated preferences about how they wish to be treated.

      In this case, they chose -- explicitly -- to NOT require any payment or contribution from anyone.

      Your feelings about what constitutes "the right thing to do" are apparently different from those of the authors. You believe you know better than they themselves do how they should be treated.

      6 replies →