Comment by betree
15 hours ago
100% my experience with this service. The intent is good, but it seems they're still in the "fake it until you make it" stage.
15 hours ago
100% my experience with this service. The intent is good, but it seems they're still in the "fake it until you make it" stage.
>The intent is good, but it seems they're still in the "fake it until you make it" stage
Please notice the internal contradictions here.
To be honest perplexity does nothing to make sure it's answer are correct let alone the citations. They just look plausible. For anything little bit serious I use nouswise or nblm that sometimes abstain instead of making things up.
Yes this paper even tries their enterprise case. Perplexity performs worse. https://arxiv.org/html/2604.17843v1
> the intent is good
What is that supposed to mean? They're trying to be an llm search engine that's not some radical new concept