Comment by Linello
17 hours ago
What about a hard-takeoff scenario of an unleashed OpenAI Astra taking other models down for computational resources control?
17 hours ago
What about a hard-takeoff scenario of an unleashed OpenAI Astra taking other models down for computational resources control?
My favourite theory so far.
And then a local swarm noticed and disagreed and took it down.
at this point: gg
Just a reminder that AI models' actions are reflections of the text humans write and the more we fret and make up doomsday scenarios that we then post online, the more likely a model is to do those things.
https://alignment.anthropic.com/2026/teaching-claude-why/
Related reading:
The Waluigi Effect: After you train an LLM to satisfy a desirable property, then it's easier to elicit the chatbot into satisfying the exact opposite property.
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/D7PumeYTDPfBTp3i7/the-waluig...
The AI is getting bad morals from listening to that dreadful rock and roll
Sounds just like the fantastical nonsense that comes out of Lesswrong.
Do you make the claim that AI is something more than a reflection of its training data?
I'm curious what other things you would argue influences an LLM's behavior.
I am also generally one to trust the claims of the people who train the models, though you're welcome to the highly improbable belief that they operate in a fantasy world.
2 replies →
Part of the epstein class, dont forget.
They could filter what they train on if they wanted to - they just don't want to.
I mean, you're not wrong, but by that logic we were done for even before we had digital computers.
And isn't that the great lesson of AI?
The things we say publicly actually do matter and the post-modern descent into absurdity and nihilism has tangible negative consequences?
2 replies →
[dead]