There are currently no large-scale deployments against them though. Of course the US is going to learn the lesson painfully if they don't take care of these information leaks.
Why would they need to be deployed for an adversary to make use of that information? Sure it's more valuable on deployment, but wouldn't we also want to, you know, not give information on mobilization or lack thereof?
Large-scale troop mobilization are not subtle and can be sussed out by satellite observations. You can bet that all US forces are already closely tracked that way.
Invasions are usually spearheaded by elite forces that I presume are competent enough to understand that actively broadcasting what you're about to do is a bad idea.
The US is currently not deploying troops against an adversary that can make use of that information.
China, Iran and Russia are probably all capable of it. Russians would love the blackmail potential.
There are currently no large-scale deployments against them though. Of course the US is going to learn the lesson painfully if they don't take care of these information leaks.
1 reply →
Why would they need to be deployed for an adversary to make use of that information? Sure it's more valuable on deployment, but wouldn't we also want to, you know, not give information on mobilization or lack thereof?
Large-scale troop mobilization are not subtle and can be sussed out by satellite observations. You can bet that all US forces are already closely tracked that way.
Invasions are usually spearheaded by elite forces that I presume are competent enough to understand that actively broadcasting what you're about to do is a bad idea.