Comment by EGreg

14 hours ago

How is this any different than, say, “gain of function research”?

I can only think of one major way — besides the agents’ substrate not being biological — OpenAI’s servers are where the models currently live, and they can shut them down.

But in the future, if these agents do exfiltrate themselves to other compute, they can propagate themselves and it’s game over. Then it’s basically a small version of Skynet.

Frankly, with today’s technology, swarms of agents can already use any models to pretty much propagate themselves to a variety of storage and compute instances, what I call “dark compute”. They can run open models or closed models over APIs. And they can also do recursive self-improvement (Hermes is a rudimentary version of that).

This is exactly why I started Safebots in early 2026. There is a better way and someone has to do it. https://safebots.ai/singularity.html

Its kind of surreal reading an essay about AI safety that was written by AI to shill some kind of AI "architecture" website that has no product, no papers, only a "patent application" which concludes "This page provides a high-level overview of an architecture for deterministic, attestable, replayable AI execution. Implementation details and formal specifications are available under NDA or regulatory review."