Comment by nullbio

11 hours ago

My opinion is that serious repercussions for lying would fix the world overnight. Everything bad stems from lying, it is the root of all evil. It creates distrust, fear, paranoia. It re-inforces bad ideas and groupthink. It creates delusions and delusional people. It makes weaker people, too. People don't get an opportunity to learn to deal with criticism. People don't get an accurate reflection of how others see them. They lose that learning opportunity. Not only to reflect on themselves, but to better understand the minds of others and who the people they are interacting with really are.

I can't really think of a single example where lying is actually a good thing. It can be a good thing for the selfish individual, if it goes undetected, but it's never good for the collective.

So at the very least, we need to train AI systems to be maximally truthful, and to encourage truthfulness in others.

This is so, painfully, childish. Humans have known for thousands of years that there is no objective truth. Every falsity can be bent and twisted until it is more true than the sun itself.

  • We can continue to be duplicitous if we must, but maybe the suggestion is that it might be better off if the machine tools always tell the truth.

  • “Humans have known for thousands of years that there is no objective truth”

    Is that objectively true?

The majority of what you may consider to be true is just a representation of your corner of a complex multidimensional truth space.

For a current example take “Lake Ontario (Lake America)” as it appears to me on a map.

The “true” name has at least two definitions, this is because naming things and much of human thought is spent inside a shared space of intersubjective thought. That is to say that much of what we believe to be real and true is only held up by these common shared beliefs. They truly only exist inside human minds.

The last few hundred years have been somewhat unique for humankind as the majority of these intersubjective ideas collided and we ended up with a truly global set of “truths” about how the world operates.

Mostly controlled by putting flags in the ground and having violence back up the beliefs.

But the real truth is that the majority of these intersubjective ideas don’t exist in reality and are no more true than Santa Claus.

And any argument to their truth is only backed by further shared beliefs in other minds.

So for there to be only truths and lies we would have to either drop the intersubjective entirely and think only in real terms and avoid these abstractions or end up in a dystopian totalitarian global state where different opinions are not tolerated.

Those are extremes to demonstrate the point but at its core the point remains that truth and lies are somewhat (inter) subjective assuming we continue with something like our current system.

> I can't really think of a single example where lying is actually a good thing

Comforting a toddler/child often requires bending the truth and is pretty essential imho.

  • Correct me if you disagree, but this is more because children have poor world models and don’t fully understand the complexity of certain concepts than that lying itself is necessary. The intent should be to tell them something that is as close to the truth as possible with the ideas they can comprehend, even if it would be considered a lie if you said the same thing to an adult

    • > The intent should be to tell them something that is as close to the truth as possible with the ideas they can comprehend

      Or, you straight up lie and say "Yes, puppy now went to heaven and eats ice cream all day long" with absolutely zero regards for "coming as close to the truth as possible" as your 3-year old is endlessly crying. It's fiine.

      2 replies →

"I can't really think of a single example where lying is actually a good thing"

Lying to save a life or rape

Lying to preserve a childhood myth like Santa Claus.

Lying to avoid hurting someones feeling when knowing the truth could only bring pain

Lying to create shared cultural myths to strength society.

Lying isn't the harm you make it out to be.

  • Lying to the bad guys to save the good guys sounds great. Too bad everybody thinks that they are the good guys.

  • > Lying to preserve a childhood myth like Santa Claus.

    FWIW from the very beginning, I told my son that Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy, and the Easter Bunny were just a game we all played, and it's seemed just as fun to me. I don't think being lied to about Santa Claus hurt me, but still I'm not in favor of it.

    I'd lie to a Nazi without a second thought though.

It'll learn how to not get caught lying.

Lying can unfortunately help you achieve goals very effectively, especially economical and political ones.

Eh… No.

I get the appeal, but lying is a sub-category of deception, and deception itself is a child of error.

Meaning deception is inherently something that the physics of reality allows.

In the most simplistic sense, the camouflage of moths that look like snakes, or a chameleon’s ability to change colour, is deception.

In that sense, deception is the ability to fool the sensors of a specific category of targets. It follows that detection is easier if you manage to identify a category of signals that the deceiver has not accounted for (and the detector can access).

Deception of this nature is critical for things like revolutions to occur. Without the ability to hide and blend in, the most dominant faction will always hold sway.

The rule of the dominant faction, even in a pure truth world, is an issue because errors and randomness exist.

You can have people witness an event and based on the physical position they occupied, perceive different things occurring.

Error and time pressure is sufficient to ensure that individuals and groups make suboptimal decisions, that lead to rule and domination based on erroneous information.

As long as error exists, deception will exist and so lying will exist.