Comment by nozzlegear
14 hours ago
> If you need privacy, then you are going to have to pay full price for those tokens (API).
At this point, how can we even trust that they aren't accidentally training on those tokens too?
14 hours ago
> If you need privacy, then you are going to have to pay full price for those tokens (API).
At this point, how can we even trust that they aren't accidentally training on those tokens too?
It'd be corporate suicide for them to be caught violating zero-data-retention commitments. But also if you're really paranoid you can just use ChatGPT on Azure or AWS, where nothing is flowing back to OpenAI at all.
> It'd be corporate suicide for them to be caught violating zero-data-retention commitments.
One would think getting caught asleep at the wheel while their bots are escaping containment and hacking third parties would be corporate suicide. One would think that potentially stealing their competitors' work on the Navier-Stokes problem would be corporate suicide.
Alas we live in bizarro world where there are zero consequences (maybe the opposite, in fact) for the first, and their employees meme about the second on social media.
Neither of those other two examples would stop corporations from giving you money. Bold faced lying to them would.
Boardrooms run businesses, not bookstore ethics clubs.
2 replies →
Not long ago it'd have been corporate suicide being caught massively torrenting pirated media. Yet here we are.
> It'd be corporate suicide for them to be caught violating zero-data-retention commitments
Would it, though? Considering their entire business model is built on the agglomeration of data that isnt theirs.