* It filters out things that are clearly not AI related (like the one titled ' Mind-altering drugs played key role in rise of Andean civilization ') - or maybe it's just slow to update (that post was 3 hours ago)
* No ability to go to the next page
* Order is often different than on HN, even account for the missing posts. It's mostly the same, but not quite, which always throws me for a loop to see if something else is missing.
I don't personally use those apps so I'm not sure, but if they're open source I'm confident you could easily update them to work with my site. In case it's useful, here's the source code https://github.com/leiDnedyA/hn-without-ai
At the bottom of the linked site, it says "79 of 179 submissions survived the filter" so if only ~44% survived I'd say that counts as "prevalent" yeah.
I guess I more meant what is it filtering. Anything talking about AI, or just things created by it? And it created by AI is the filter, how are they discovering that?
I like the idea, but have a couple problems:
* It filters out things that are clearly not AI related (like the one titled ' Mind-altering drugs played key role in rise of Andean civilization ') - or maybe it's just slow to update (that post was 3 hours ago)
* No ability to go to the next page
* Order is often different than on HN, even account for the missing posts. It's mostly the same, but not quite, which always throws me for a loop to see if something else is missing.
Thank you for sharing my site :)
Do you know if there is a way of pointing any of the hackernews phone apps to your site instead of the official one?
I don't personally use those apps so I'm not sure, but if they're open source I'm confident you could easily update them to work with my site. In case it's useful, here's the source code https://github.com/leiDnedyA/hn-without-ai
4 replies →
Thank you for basically only filtering and not changing the style. :)
Help me out here. Is AI something prevalent on HN now? I check the site a lot but just browse headlines and visit some sites.
At the bottom of the linked site, it says "79 of 179 submissions survived the filter" so if only ~44% survived I'd say that counts as "prevalent" yeah.
I guess I more meant what is it filtering. Anything talking about AI, or just things created by it? And it created by AI is the filter, how are they discovering that?