Comment by reilly3000 1 day ago Mutually assured destruction has worked fine for 80 years, why stop now? 2 comments reilly3000 Reply SheinhardtWigCo 1 day ago Because the risk here is that permanent military superiority may be achievable without your adversaries having a chance to react, which is not the case with atomic weapons. timr 1 day ago I don’t know if you’re being facetious, but last time I checked, the world had not been destroyed by glob thermonuclear war.So yeah, it has worked.
SheinhardtWigCo 1 day ago Because the risk here is that permanent military superiority may be achievable without your adversaries having a chance to react, which is not the case with atomic weapons.
timr 1 day ago I don’t know if you’re being facetious, but last time I checked, the world had not been destroyed by glob thermonuclear war.So yeah, it has worked.
Because the risk here is that permanent military superiority may be achievable without your adversaries having a chance to react, which is not the case with atomic weapons.
I don’t know if you’re being facetious, but last time I checked, the world had not been destroyed by glob thermonuclear war.
So yeah, it has worked.