Comment by cs702
2 hours ago
"Backprop alternative" was the OP's headline.
I think my initial assessment is correct: interesting research, but not an alternative, at least not yet.
2 hours ago
"Backprop alternative" was the OP's headline.
I think my initial assessment is correct: interesting research, but not an alternative, at least not yet.
Ah. I missed that. Yeah. "Backprop alternative" is the wrong framing.
Thanks. The exaggerated framing is the only reason why I posted my comment :-)