Comment by dgellow 21 hours ago Why would you assume it is revolutionary? 4 comments dgellow Reply dasyatidprime 17 hours ago They wrote “if and why”. catigula 20 hours ago Because “recursive self-improvement” is widely understood, even at labs, as having a non-trivial chance of eradicating human life.This is like asking why a paper called “I discovered God. This is the specific proof.” is revolutionary. Just tedious levels of incredulity. dgellow 19 hours ago Anyone who seriously believe that and isn’t being hyperbolic for shock purpose is delusional. It’s a pretty standard research paper, you cannot assume any research that contains the terms RSI to be revolutionary
catigula 20 hours ago Because “recursive self-improvement” is widely understood, even at labs, as having a non-trivial chance of eradicating human life.This is like asking why a paper called “I discovered God. This is the specific proof.” is revolutionary. Just tedious levels of incredulity. dgellow 19 hours ago Anyone who seriously believe that and isn’t being hyperbolic for shock purpose is delusional. It’s a pretty standard research paper, you cannot assume any research that contains the terms RSI to be revolutionary
dgellow 19 hours ago Anyone who seriously believe that and isn’t being hyperbolic for shock purpose is delusional. It’s a pretty standard research paper, you cannot assume any research that contains the terms RSI to be revolutionary
They wrote “if and why”.
Because “recursive self-improvement” is widely understood, even at labs, as having a non-trivial chance of eradicating human life.
This is like asking why a paper called “I discovered God. This is the specific proof.” is revolutionary. Just tedious levels of incredulity.
Anyone who seriously believe that and isn’t being hyperbolic for shock purpose is delusional. It’s a pretty standard research paper, you cannot assume any research that contains the terms RSI to be revolutionary