← Back to context Comment by dgellow 20 hours ago Why would you assume it is revolutionary? 4 comments dgellow Reply dasyatidprime 16 hours ago They wrote “if and why”. catigula 19 hours ago Because “recursive self-improvement” is widely understood, even at labs, as having a non-trivial chance of eradicating human life.This is like asking why a paper called “I discovered God. This is the specific proof.” is revolutionary. Just tedious levels of incredulity. dgellow 18 hours ago Anyone who seriously believe that and isn’t being hyperbolic for shock purpose is delusional. It’s a pretty standard research paper, you cannot assume any research that contains the terms RSI to be revolutionary
catigula 19 hours ago Because “recursive self-improvement” is widely understood, even at labs, as having a non-trivial chance of eradicating human life.This is like asking why a paper called “I discovered God. This is the specific proof.” is revolutionary. Just tedious levels of incredulity. dgellow 18 hours ago Anyone who seriously believe that and isn’t being hyperbolic for shock purpose is delusional. It’s a pretty standard research paper, you cannot assume any research that contains the terms RSI to be revolutionary
dgellow 18 hours ago Anyone who seriously believe that and isn’t being hyperbolic for shock purpose is delusional. It’s a pretty standard research paper, you cannot assume any research that contains the terms RSI to be revolutionary
They wrote “if and why”.
Because “recursive self-improvement” is widely understood, even at labs, as having a non-trivial chance of eradicating human life.
This is like asking why a paper called “I discovered God. This is the specific proof.” is revolutionary. Just tedious levels of incredulity.
Anyone who seriously believe that and isn’t being hyperbolic for shock purpose is delusional. It’s a pretty standard research paper, you cannot assume any research that contains the terms RSI to be revolutionary