← Back to context Comment by dgellow 1 day ago Why would you assume it is revolutionary? 4 comments dgellow Reply dasyatidprime 19 hours ago They wrote “if and why”. catigula 1 day ago Because “recursive self-improvement” is widely understood, even at labs, as having a non-trivial chance of eradicating human life.This is like asking why a paper called “I discovered God. This is the specific proof.” is revolutionary. Just tedious levels of incredulity. dgellow 1 day ago Anyone who seriously believe that and isn’t being hyperbolic for shock purpose is delusional. It’s a pretty standard research paper, you cannot assume any research that contains the terms RSI to be revolutionary
catigula 1 day ago Because “recursive self-improvement” is widely understood, even at labs, as having a non-trivial chance of eradicating human life.This is like asking why a paper called “I discovered God. This is the specific proof.” is revolutionary. Just tedious levels of incredulity. dgellow 1 day ago Anyone who seriously believe that and isn’t being hyperbolic for shock purpose is delusional. It’s a pretty standard research paper, you cannot assume any research that contains the terms RSI to be revolutionary
dgellow 1 day ago Anyone who seriously believe that and isn’t being hyperbolic for shock purpose is delusional. It’s a pretty standard research paper, you cannot assume any research that contains the terms RSI to be revolutionary
They wrote “if and why”.
Because “recursive self-improvement” is widely understood, even at labs, as having a non-trivial chance of eradicating human life.
This is like asking why a paper called “I discovered God. This is the specific proof.” is revolutionary. Just tedious levels of incredulity.
Anyone who seriously believe that and isn’t being hyperbolic for shock purpose is delusional. It’s a pretty standard research paper, you cannot assume any research that contains the terms RSI to be revolutionary