Comment by text0404

5 days ago

We're discussing the article that summarizes the report's findings, but sure.

Please refer to the report [1] and read the following sections (they are too long to paste here):

- II (full section)

- IV.B.1 (full section)

- IV.B.2.88-89

- IV.B.2.95-96

- V.B (full section)

The report itself attributes its sources. If that's not enough, the DoD's own preliminary investigation produced the outdated-targeting finding. Pre-strike imagery of the school is public.

[1] https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/hrbodies...

8 comments

text0404

Reply
andriy_koval  5 days ago

[flagged]

  • text0404  5 days ago

    This has to be a troll. You're literally replying in a comment thread where I've already summarized the material findings that you're asking for (it's from the article we're discussing). I then pasted links to the raw text of the report that support the summary but you refuse to read it, asking me again for a summary which I already posted? I've provided everything you've asked for; do you actually have a point or are you just trying to start a flamewar?

    • andriy_koval  5 days ago

      > I've already summarized the material findings

      I asked about material evidence(I mentioned word "evidence" multiple times), not "findings", which is loaded term

      5 replies →