Comment by Skunkleton
17 hours ago
Related username?
To answer the original question, most people who care about their filesystem at all care about its stability. Not just "does it work now" but also "will it work and improve over time". Infighting puts the future at risk.
It really does.
But you might want to check out the bus factor on btrfs too; when a maintainer says "but we've saved Facebook billions and billions of dollars!", calls for the other filesystem maintainer to be ejected from the community, then quits to join Anthropic a month later - that's not a vote of confidence.
I'd be very happy if people could just stop bringing up drama and us factors. We put it behind us a year ago, but it seems not everyone got the memo.
Checking the bus factor:
Btrfs regulars:
- 1 from Meta
- 1 from Oracle
- 4 from SuSe
- 2 from WDC
bcachefs:
- Kent Overstreet
And Btrfs still does not have a RAID-5/6 that they themselves recommend for usage:
* https://btrfs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/btrfs-man5.html#man-b...
What have they been doing for the last decade(+)?
1 reply →
Might end in a new bcachefs fork beeing included back into mainline. If companies sponsor a few fulltime devs working on the new fork, we finally might have a stable enterprise ready CoW filesystem.