Comment by jasonwatkinspdx

No, what I and the other commenter are saying is you don't understand why the article is misleading because you don't know the actual scholarly knowledge here.

In your other comment you use wording along the lines of "still useful to show what problem each technology solved" but the part you're missing is the explanations are largely wrong, not just in the sense of not telling actual history but you will come alway with mistaken conclusions because the imagined/example history is fundamentally wrong.

So, consider if you're getting this from multiple people, perhaps you're missing something on the topic.