Comment by DonHopkins 6 days ago [dead] 2 comments DonHopkins Reply relevant_stats 6 days ago > Ironic, isn't it? Yet you continue your lackluster form devoid any criticism of ideas.Pointing out someone's contradiction is now being 'critical of form'? And someone's contradicting themselves is 'ironic'?Now I'm not even sure you know the meaning of words you use. EOT from me. DonHopkins 6 days ago Your claim that suspected AI assistance proves the author isn't interested -- and therefore that the work is probably superficial -- is unsupported.
relevant_stats 6 days ago > Ironic, isn't it? Yet you continue your lackluster form devoid any criticism of ideas.Pointing out someone's contradiction is now being 'critical of form'? And someone's contradicting themselves is 'ironic'?Now I'm not even sure you know the meaning of words you use. EOT from me. DonHopkins 6 days ago Your claim that suspected AI assistance proves the author isn't interested -- and therefore that the work is probably superficial -- is unsupported.
DonHopkins 6 days ago Your claim that suspected AI assistance proves the author isn't interested -- and therefore that the work is probably superficial -- is unsupported.
> Ironic, isn't it? Yet you continue your lackluster form devoid any criticism of ideas.
Pointing out someone's contradiction is now being 'critical of form'? And someone's contradicting themselves is 'ironic'?
Now I'm not even sure you know the meaning of words you use. EOT from me.
Your claim that suspected AI assistance proves the author isn't interested -- and therefore that the work is probably superficial -- is unsupported.