Comment by teravor

1 hour ago

that smells like bullshit to be fair. if you have a system that makes errors over 90% of the time then you have a system you can leverage to make fewer errors.

the situation would have to be very particular/contrived for that not to be the case.

What if you want errors to happen, e.g. deny care, bomb civilians; in that case 90% error rate is what you want, and plausible deniably so!

What makes you think they are financially motivated to make fewer "errors" (improper denial of care while keeping premiums)?