← Back to context

Comment by unified101

2 hours ago

I'm afraid this is "cope".

There's hardly any work you can think of which can't be done faster / beter with ai assistance, when your role is of reviewing and directing. If you have an anti-example, would like to hear.

Not OP but here's my take on it.

> There's hardly any work you can think of which can't be done faster / beter with ai assistance

True, and someone needs to be the creative brain behind the decisions. AI can help you implement. When I say help, I mean literally help because one-shotting and vague prompts can get you only so far, usually with a lackluster result. Ultimately, it is some creative actor that needs to understand the bigger picture to evaluate trade-offs better. For now that actor is a human.

> If you have an anti-example, would like to hear.

In my personal experience, especially with greenfield projects, smarter models tend to overengineer the solutions. However, I haven't used Fable and Astra models, maybe they are better at creative tasks without overengineering.