Comment by pandinus 2 days ago [flagged] 5 comments pandinus Reply kccqzy 2 days ago Funny how you mention it is a functional programming torture course, but the Parquet writer introduced in this article is written in a highly imperative style. I have not seen this much IORefs and MutableByteArrays in recent memory. okasaki 2 days ago That's just what you have to do to get any kind of performance in Haskell because functional programming is pointless. internet_points 2 days ago not the okasaki of Purely Functional Data Structures fame I guess? whateveracct 2 days ago deeply untrue lol 4b11b4 2 days ago What! I loved my func prog class with HaskellShould be mandatory
kccqzy 2 days ago Funny how you mention it is a functional programming torture course, but the Parquet writer introduced in this article is written in a highly imperative style. I have not seen this much IORefs and MutableByteArrays in recent memory. okasaki 2 days ago That's just what you have to do to get any kind of performance in Haskell because functional programming is pointless. internet_points 2 days ago not the okasaki of Purely Functional Data Structures fame I guess? whateveracct 2 days ago deeply untrue lol
okasaki 2 days ago That's just what you have to do to get any kind of performance in Haskell because functional programming is pointless. internet_points 2 days ago not the okasaki of Purely Functional Data Structures fame I guess? whateveracct 2 days ago deeply untrue lol
Funny how you mention it is a functional programming torture course, but the Parquet writer introduced in this article is written in a highly imperative style. I have not seen this much IORefs and MutableByteArrays in recent memory.
That's just what you have to do to get any kind of performance in Haskell because functional programming is pointless.
not the okasaki of Purely Functional Data Structures fame I guess?
deeply untrue lol
What! I loved my func prog class with Haskell
Should be mandatory