Comment by rob74 1 month ago That was probably more Igor Sleeperagentovich than Joe Public, but yeah... 6 comments rob74 Reply cherryteastain 1 month ago It's much easier for Russia to destroy data centers in orbit. rob74 1 month ago Easier maybe, but if they want to keep up some degree of plausible deniability over who did it, it becomes harder. Marha01 1 month ago > It's much easier for Russia to destroy data centers in orbit.Nope. Depending on the number of satellites in the constellation, it could be very hard or impossible. Russia has only so many orbital-class interceptors. hdgvhicv 1 month ago And after the first few Kessler provides far more 2 replies →
cherryteastain 1 month ago It's much easier for Russia to destroy data centers in orbit. rob74 1 month ago Easier maybe, but if they want to keep up some degree of plausible deniability over who did it, it becomes harder. Marha01 1 month ago > It's much easier for Russia to destroy data centers in orbit.Nope. Depending on the number of satellites in the constellation, it could be very hard or impossible. Russia has only so many orbital-class interceptors. hdgvhicv 1 month ago And after the first few Kessler provides far more 2 replies →
rob74 1 month ago Easier maybe, but if they want to keep up some degree of plausible deniability over who did it, it becomes harder.
Marha01 1 month ago > It's much easier for Russia to destroy data centers in orbit.Nope. Depending on the number of satellites in the constellation, it could be very hard or impossible. Russia has only so many orbital-class interceptors. hdgvhicv 1 month ago And after the first few Kessler provides far more 2 replies →
It's much easier for Russia to destroy data centers in orbit.
Easier maybe, but if they want to keep up some degree of plausible deniability over who did it, it becomes harder.
> It's much easier for Russia to destroy data centers in orbit.
Nope. Depending on the number of satellites in the constellation, it could be very hard or impossible. Russia has only so many orbital-class interceptors.
And after the first few Kessler provides far more
2 replies →