Comment by walrus01

15 hours ago

I realize we're talking about a civil case here and not criminal but it's not factually correct to say statutes of limitations always prevent a historical wrong from being addressed. There's a number of jurisdictions which have no statue of limitations on sexual assault cases for example.

Somewhat randomly chosen reference:

https://www.richardnelsonllp.co.uk/guides/statute-of-limitat...

> it's not factually correct to say statutes of limitations always prevent a historical wrong from being addressed

Nobody has made this claim.