Comment by refurb

It took me a while to figure out what happened, but this is my understanding.

1. OP was granted 25,000 options.

2. OP was told by Nvidia their options had vested and they need to exercise. OP said ok, I’ll exercise.

3. Nvidia made an error in stating the number of options (although the paperwork had the correct number), so only a portion were exercised.

4. The remaining options expired as they were not exercised.

So the legal argument is that Nvidia’s error in stating the number of options resulted in OP’s loss. However lawyers have told OP the statue of limitation on such a civil suit have passed thus no point in pursuing it.

Is that it?