Comment by 0c3ca83

4 hours ago

If it's generating detectably incorrect code, why do you need an LLM to tell you it's a bug?

Encountering something that seems incorrect, and proving something is a bug and not just YOUR user error, AND reproducing it minimally - turns out to not be easy when it's a low-level compiler issue, and YOU'RE not an expert, especially when it relates to Dwarf tables...

Typically, any time you think you've found a compiler error, you're using it wrong...

  • If it's a real bug, you can just report what you know and leave it at that. You don't need to embellish it with random guesses about a root cause.

    Okay: "I compile this input and the linker crashes."

    Not okay: "I compile this input and the linker crashes. Also here's 10 paragraphs of slop about dwarf tables, which I can't even evaluate the accuracy of since I'm not an expert."

    > Typically, any time you think you've found a compiler error, you're using it wrong...

    Yes, if you can't figure out if it's a bug, the bug tracker is the wrong place to get help. Ask in a community forum instead.

    • > Not okay: "I compile this input and the linker crashes. Also here's 10 paragraphs of slop about dwarf tables, which I can't even evaluate the accuracy of since I'm not an expert."

      It's a 20-line file with a few commands to run it to reproduce it. Not 10 paragraphs of slop.

      Presumably that is much more helpful than - here's my gigantic repo, good luck running my tests, also good luck finding the bug.

      1 reply →