Comment by jeremyjh

7 hours ago

I think he was perhaps right and Meta was perhaps also right to replace him.

The argument is that LLMs are a local maximum that will never breakthrough to AGI. This is still very much an open question. If you are the fifth-best AI lab, does it make sense to try to outcompete everyone in a space that is already too crowded and may not ever yield their actual objective? Instead they could just use open weight models in their products, or post-train on open models like smaller labs have done, and treat that as what it is: product development.

Pure research has always been about taking chances.

I mean, it's an "open question" in the sense that there is no theory behind the idea of AGI, so there's no way to falsify any claim about whether or not any particular path will lead to it.