Comment by calmworm 5 hours ago What is “getting LLMs to prompt other LLMs” if not a prompt? 11 comments calmworm Reply pixl97 4 hours ago I'm pretty sure the initial post said "humans had to prompt", or otherwise insinuate a human in the loop. dpoloncsak 4 hours ago Right. Even when an LLM prompts an LLM, what prompted the first one in the chain? hackyhacky 4 hours ago You are describing the " unmoved mover", an argument for the existence of Godhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unmoved_mover 8 replies →
pixl97 4 hours ago I'm pretty sure the initial post said "humans had to prompt", or otherwise insinuate a human in the loop. dpoloncsak 4 hours ago Right. Even when an LLM prompts an LLM, what prompted the first one in the chain? hackyhacky 4 hours ago You are describing the " unmoved mover", an argument for the existence of Godhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unmoved_mover 8 replies →
dpoloncsak 4 hours ago Right. Even when an LLM prompts an LLM, what prompted the first one in the chain? hackyhacky 4 hours ago You are describing the " unmoved mover", an argument for the existence of Godhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unmoved_mover 8 replies →
hackyhacky 4 hours ago You are describing the " unmoved mover", an argument for the existence of Godhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unmoved_mover 8 replies →
I'm pretty sure the initial post said "humans had to prompt", or otherwise insinuate a human in the loop.
Right. Even when an LLM prompts an LLM, what prompted the first one in the chain?
You are describing the " unmoved mover", an argument for the existence of God
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unmoved_mover
8 replies →