← Back to context

Comment by aoeusnth1

20 hours ago

Seriously, what's special about oncology that convinces you there will be no progress?

I think gp was saying they'd never give it to you, not that they'd never make progress.

  • A normal conspiratorial comment about the cure for cancer being kept secret would have been downvoted into oblivion, but sprinkle in some spooky AI stuff and suddenly it's fine

    • In the interest of steel-manning, I think it’s not about a cure being kept secret but rather non-elites being stripped of the leverage they would need to access it.

      3 replies →

  • That is ridiculous. You cannot withhold something like an effective cure for cancer from broad adoption, and thinking you can is just conspiracy bullshit. Imagine an internal OpenAI model develops it tomorrow. Would everyone of the thousands of OpenAI scientists get in on the conspiracy to keep it secret, even though many of them probably know someone dying from cancer right now? Obviously not.

    • I'm sorry, do you understand how the medical industry works? It wouldn't be one cure, it's going to be dozens of treatments, each of which will be incredibly expensive.

      Or else how do you explain Danyelza? Used to treat neuroblastoma, costs upwards of $1m per year. Do you have any proof that this will be different?

      You're calling realistic people conspiracy theorists. Whose side are you on?

      6 replies →

What makes you think we'll be able to afford them? You won't be making any money anymore, hope you've saved up!